INFORMATION DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE—Lesson One

Barry W. Hamilton, Ph.D.

Northeastern Seminary (Rochester, NY)

 

*Why bother learning about ‘information description language’? Because the problem of information retrieval demands an efficient and systematic method for finding the right information quickly among the vast amount of recorded material. Imagine the difficulty sorting out the information you need for your research paper if you had to rummage through a mountain of unorganized material. Suppose the clerk at the supermarket had to look up the price on every item in your grocery cart.  Or the Department of Motor Vehicles had to dig through piles of paper to find record of the driver’s license you lost.  Society depends on information organization and retrieval, and libraries operate on principles of organization. 

 

*Suppose you decide to research the topic, “The Christological Hymn of Philippians 2:11-14.”  How would you muster courage to undertake the prodigious task of locating the right information?  For the library to support this type of research, the library must (1) systematically collect the types of resources that support this subject area, (2) organize the resources according to a classification scheme, and (3) provide a means for systematically searching for specific information (catalog).  Without these means of organized information retrieval, research would require a prohibitive investment of time and effort.  You’d have to dedicate your life to tracking down resources for your paper, with no time left for nonacademic pursuits like windsurfing or backpacking.

 

*Ever rummage through a stack of scholarly books trying to find something on the communicatio idiomatum?  Frustrating, right?  Imagine how much trouble it would be to find information for your paper by examining the contents of actual books and articles, one-by-one.  Fortunately, we don’t have to examine each individual resource, in every instance, to find the information we need.  People have devised means for finding related resources through terms that represent the concepts in those resources.  These terms represent different levels of concepts, and there are various means for deriving these terms, but we discuss these terms as “information description language” because the terms represent the bits of information for which we’re looking. 

 

*Most information searches in today’s libraries use computers to quickly sort through enormous quantities of information.  However, many library patrons—kids, adults, students, faculty—approach the library’s computers with unrealistic expectations and little knowledge about how the information retrieval process works.  Most people forget that computers aren’t human and consequently don’t understand normal communication patterns.  This happens all the time when people surf the Internet. The task is to translate information needs into language that the information retrieval system can understand. 

 

*Translation of needs into language requires communication, and communication involves the transfer of information.  Communication involves the risk of ‘noise’—interference that distorts the message.  While ‘noise’ is something you hear in budget motels, we’re speaking here of ‘noise’ as distorted communication.  ‘Noise’ happens in everyday communication—particularly when library patrons are expressing their information needs to reference librarians.  ‘Noise’ gives rise to misunderstanding—for example, an undergraduate student wants information on Cubism, and receives a highly specialized monograph on art history.  The frustrated student quickly explains that all s/he needs is a brief one-page overview (the paper is due tomorrow morning). 

 

*Reference librarians are well acquainted with people who know they need information, but aren’t quite sure what they need.  The librarian’s job is to engage in dialogue and draw out the real need from the perceived need.  This comes through query and re-statement, and may take some initial forays into resources.  Often the initial forays will yield clues, and sometimes these efforts provide nothing useful.

However, the usual outcome is clarification of the person’s real information need.  People almost never state the real need in an initial statement.

 

*People often have no better outcome with online catalogs—they simply walk up to the terminal and start typing whatever comes to mind.  Sometimes they type sentences, as though they could engage in a human conversation with the computer.  Certainly, the computer/human interface is even more subject to the risk of communication noise than the human/human interface.

 

*At the beginning of your research project, write a brief summary of your topic.  Get it down in print just exactly what you want to do in this paper.  Clearly articulate the research problem you are addressing in a thesis statement.  A few hours spent focusing on your topic at the project’s inception will reap rich dividends in efficiency and significantly lower your stress level.  Make certain that you invest significant time into building your research vocabulary—this could be far more important to your research than may be obvious in the early stages of your work.  Collect terms that precisely describe your subject and consider the ways you can group them together as search terms.  This aspect of research is crucial for developing your skill in online database searching.   If you yearn to become an expert online database searcher, then learn the difference between keywords, descriptors, identifiers and subject headings.  Learn how to carry out Boolean searches.  The skilled researcher knows how to conduct title searches, author searches, keyword searches, subject searches, publication year-range searches—AND adroitly combines these searches in ‘Advanced’ or ‘Expert’ search box interfaces.  The skilled researcher interacts with the research vocabulary and ‘experiments’ with combinations of terms and search modes.

 

*After you build your research vocabulary with a rich set of search terms, experiment with various combinations of these terms in the database search interfaces. Recognize that the best keywords are the most specific terms and phrases—e.g. sacristy, pyx, hapax logomenon, Barmen Confession, Shrove Tuesday, Azusa Street Revival—and that precise searching often requires the combination of keywords, especially in a ‘soft’ subject such as religion where terms are relatively imprecise. For example, you may need to place ‘Book of Common Prayer’ and ‘1928’ in separate search boxes. Some of the best search terms are proper names—Smith Wigglesworth, Jonathan Edwards, Howard Snyder, Edward Leroy Long—but it takes sound judgment to determine whether you should search for the name as a phrase in the keyword field, as an author name, or as a subject term.  Some proper names—in the author or subject field—require dates for precision, e.g. Watson, Richard, 1781-1833.  If you search for the same ‘Richard Watson’ on an Internet search engine, you will retrieve scores of different people named Richard Watson.  Then you will need to combine terms as related to your subject—‘Richard Watson,’ Methodist or Methodism, Britain or England, ‘Wesleyan minister’—you will have to experiment to get the best results.  Remember—there’s no such thing as a ‘perfect search.’  You will always need to bring your seasoned judgment to the table.

 

*Spend some time getting acquainted with the ‘big red books’—the Library of Congress Subject Headings—these can save you a great deal of time.  Ask the staff member at the library’s reference desk to show them to you—look at the front matter for an explanation of the symbols employed throughout the set.  For a quicker, easier introduction, see my handouts Library of Congress Subject Headings—Lesson One and Library of Congress Subject Headings—Lesson Two.  As these handouts explain, subject headings are one means by which the library catalog ‘collocates’ resources.  No matter what the title, the subject heading ‘Church work with prisoners’ brings together books that contain the same main concept.  The books may contain many other concepts as well; however, the cataloging process has assigned the term ‘Church work with prisoners’ as representing—from one ‘perspective’—what the book is about as a whole.  No matter which vocabulary the title contains—incarceration, prison, jail, ‘big house’, penitentiary’—or even titles that do not have these specific terms, e.g. Ten Years on Death Row—you will still find resources that contain the same concept behind the term, ‘Church work with prisoners’. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page Last Modified

 

27 January 2006